Post #25322 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Shrewd'm.com

A merry & shrewd investing community

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!

Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!

You can ignore authors, whether they are producing too much noise or being needlessly provocative, by clicking the yellow unhappy when reading their post.

- Manlobbi

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (25)

Prev | Next

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

The purpose of that S1 filing was to remove the restrictive legend making the shares and wts free trading, once the S1 was declared, effective. Trump didn’t sell any shares at 40 plus, but, the old tricks might still be available.

Can you point to where in the registration statement it says that? It seems as though there would be media coverage if DJT had amended their documents to eliminate the lock-up period. Just because shares are registered doesn't mean they're not subject to lock-up.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (25)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.