Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |
Author: lizgdal   😊 😞
Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: Democrat Bob Menendez Indicted
Date: 09/22/23 2:40 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
A federal grand jury indictment is a serious thing, and I am confident in the U.S. Justice system. Bags of cash are a bad sign and need to be explained. And there are plenty of other questionable actions. The courts will sort this out. U.S. public officials should be careful when accepting anything of value. Part of the job should be avoiding suspicious acts. Suspicious actions should be investigated. I support more funding for FBI anti-corruption investigations and IRS tax cheat investigations. U.S. public officials will often be held accountable by both voters and the U.S. Justice system.

==== links ====
Sen. Menendez, wife indicted on bribe charges as probe finds $100,000 in gold bars, prosecutors say
apnews.com - Senator menendez indicted

COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Bribery) (As to All Defendants) in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 201(b)(1)(A) and (C) and (b)(2)(A) and (C).
s3.documentcloud.org - Menendez indictment

"The first offense, codified in section 201(b), prohibits the giving or accepting of anything of value to or by a public official, if the thing is given "with intent to influence" an official act, or if it is received by the official "in return for being influenced.""
justice.gov - Criminal resource manual bribery public officials

Sen. Whitehouse: 'Very possible illegal conduct' in billionaires' SCOTUS gifts
msnbc.com - Sen whitehouse very possible illegal conduct in billionaires scotus gifts
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to lizgdal here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community