Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search MI
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search MI


Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (44) |
Author: anchak   😊 😞
Number: of 3957 
Subject: Re: A mechanical strategy
Date: 03/26/2023 1:44 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Ray -

"Critique:
What he calls "SAFE" is what I'd call "threshold to take action" or "guiderail". It is a percentage of the current STOCK value. He uses 10%. That seems to be a very large percentage."

I called it buffer - same thing. This is what I have as alpha. Ideally a parameter you would optimize on 1950-2000 and then validate 2000+.

Then it computes the excess (above that threshold) and calls for a buy/sell of the amount of excess but ONLY if the order is for more than 5% of the current cash. That seems...odd. It works to moderate the change of cash.

AND THIS - is where when you write it down formulaically - and on a series execution - or even looking at the column in the spreadsheet you will see it just tries to maintain the 50/50 parity while the stocks going up - and then starts to allocate $ from cash on the Excess DROP on the downside. Since its a fixed 5% - your executions will dwindle in size too in line with the drops - ie you buy LESS and LESS.

And hence - its conceptually flawed - you dont even need to test it against B&H

Best
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (44) |


Announcements
Mechanical Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds