Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Sir Dope1
Date: 07/27/23 11:46 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
I see news reports all the time about some savage attacking an innocent and it comes out he has a lengthy record of prior violence and is out and about as he is awaiting trial for a couple more felonies. One here is Houston was actually wearing an ankle monitor as he attacked and killed someone.

Except that your Houston example isn't a case where the person had a lengthy record of prior violence.

I believe you're referring to this case:

harriscountyda.com - Houston man sentenced to years in prison for cypress area murder

Looking at the facts described in the article, it's hard to see how the judge in the prior crime could have ordered pre-trial detention. The defendant was a minor, 16 or 17 years old. He was charged with attempted burglary - a crime that the Texas state legislature (not a body known for being "woke") has not included in the list of "offenses involving violence" for which pre-trial detention can be authorized. And under Texas law (again, set by the conservative state legislature), the law is tilted towards presuming that a person should be released on bond:

"In each criminal case, unless specifically provided by other law, there is a rebuttable presumption that bail, conditions of release, or both bail and conditions of release are sufficient to reasonably ensure the defendant's appearance in court as required and the safety of the community, law enforcement, and the victim of the alleged offense."

statutes.capitol.texas.gov: Texas Constitution and Statutes

Based on the facts presented in the article, the magistrate in the first case was probably required by state law to release him on bond with an ankle monitor.

Albaby

I don't want to derail the thread, but note that this is another example where having a gun in the house ended up being a terrible thing for the gun owner. Victim was being robbed, but managed to go for his gun - but instead of preventing the robbery, victim ended up being shot to death when the perp shot back. If he hadn't owned a gun, victim would have had a good chance of surviving the encounter.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community