Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |
Author: Goofyhoofy 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: Politico on the Biden coup + NYT
Date: 08/14/24 3:35 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 22
In the before times, it was unthinkable to force an incumbent president off the ticket in July.

Nixon was pushed out in August. Ha ha ha. Of course it wasn’t the August after the convention had decided he was the candidate but then the Biden push wasn’t before the convention had decided on a candidate either.

Here’s a question. Suppose someone won enough delegates to win the nomination at the convention, but before the convention they died. Or decided they weren’t going to run (LBJ). Or were killed before the convention, but had “committed” delegates (RFK).

There is no “official” party candidate until the nominating convention at which time one becomes “the candidate.” I suppose you could make the technical argument that the convention should vote for the candidate who won the primaries, which would be Biden, who would then decline, and then a second vote would be taken and any candidates who wanted to announce could do so and then either win or lose the nomination.

It is, I think, a distinction without a difference since the announced candidate (Biden) has already said he won’t accept the nomination. I was personally hoping for an open convention but I am not unhappy with how it is playing out. For a political newcomer, Kamala has shown some amazing dexterity in locking up the nomination in a remarkably short time - and in launching a campaign from zero to 60 in a matter of days.

what has happened is a slap in the face to the democratic process

If this is a slap then January 6th was a body blow. And wouldn’t it be great if the Republican Party had somebody strong enough to sidle up to the Orange man and say “You know, you’re demented. You’re old. You’re spewing nonsense. You’ve cost us elections in 2018, 2020, 2022, and it looks like maybe 2024. Maybe you should exit and give some new blood a chance.”

But Republicans can’t do that even though they secretly know they’re on a negative, downhill, very bad trajectory. I guess they’re just pussies, afraid to confront the truth even though it’s staring them in the face.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Goofyhoofy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community