Post #6714 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (19)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 0

OK, so that bit was specious.

I was a bit surprised at the summary judgment. As you say, that means Trump's lawyers didn't have anything. Nada. Probably has less implications for Trump, and more for his "business". He is insulated -at least somewhat- because his underlings no doubt signed all the paperwork. Just like the documents lawyer at Mar-a-Lago (she's in deep doo-doo). The Guardian was saying that his entire business could come crashing down.

Of more interest to me are the various charges surrounding his attempts to stay in office illegally. He could actually do jail time for those. Of course, if his company collapses, he's not going to be able to pay his lawyers. Last I checked, even the crappy ones don't work for free.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (19)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.