Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48495 
Subject: Re: Sir Dope1
Date: 07/26/2023 2:30 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
These democrat clowns never hold felons for trial

Accused felons. That's the key - they're innocent until proven guilty.

You can't just throw someone in jail simply because you have accused them of a crime. They have to go to trial first. Until they go to trial, they are still innocent in the eyes of the law. Pre-trial detention is only permitted if you can establish a specific set of circumstances that warrants imprisoning people without trial. Under the California constitution (not the policy choices of blue cities), you can't require pre-trial detention without bail unless the defendant was charged with a felony crime of violence against another person (or certain other specific crimes not apparently present here). And you can't set bail at a higher level than is necessary to ensure appearance in court and that the defendant can pay, absent proof of risk of pre-trial flight.

This really is a "what can you do" kind of situation. One aspect of a society based on personal liberty is that the state can't lock people up without a trial. Until the guy's tried and convicted, he's a free man.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds