Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84364 
Subject: Re: Dementia Joe Biden Starts World War III?
Date: 10/01/24 9:51 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
WWIII will not come from the middle east. Israel can handle it pretty much by themselves at this point, though we do provide some logistical and fire support.

No, the real source(s) will be Russia escalating, or China escalating. Either or both are possible. Even likely. While their activities in the northern Philippine islands is making most of the news, the Chinese did just attack a Vietnamese vessel operating in internationally recognized Vietnamese waters. They are just very lucky we don't have a defense treaty with Vietnam like we do with the Philippines, and we'd likely be forced to send a battle group to Vietnamese waters.

I'm reading a piece now from the NYT regarding a report that was published about this very topic. Given how quickly war can happen today, we need to beef-up our military NOW. A "Pearl Harbor" event would leave us lacking, and we might lose before we could even respond. The Japanese couldn't mount a significant stand-off assault (I don't count their balloons, which were largely ineffective). Even DPRK today probably could. China definitely could.

We showed a lot of weakness during the convict's administration, with the convict actually admiring Putin and Xi. He was (and is) an isolationist, and they all knew it. We can't be isolationists, or a lot of democracies around the globe will be in peril. And anti-democracy will potentially rule as much of the globe as democracy does. Maybe more. That would be bad for us, and everyone else.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community