Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |
Author: EVBigMacMeal 🐝🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 21943 
Subject: Re: Playing with Fire
Date: 04/25/26 3:28 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 13
At the risk of confirming my stupidity, (as I know nothing about such matters) this is what I see as the problem with the current high valuations.

As we move from large language models (answering questions) to AI models with agency (doing things), we must surely run into a big problem. Angentic AI is already here and we are being to see how it is eliminating jobs in a major way. There is so much human inefficiency in the work place, it will incredibly easy to eliminate a large percentage of jobs.

If there are less people working, there will be less income taxes paid. Governments, who are already dealing with structural deficits (or not dealing with them!), must then provide yet more people with an income (universal income).

This means the small group of companies and individuals involved in AI make super profits. The concentration of wealth, which is already extreme, becomes more concentrated.

Then you have the problem of the AI making cars, phones etc. but AI can’t buy cars.

So you end up with governments taxing the AI companies very heavily to fund universal income. That causes their stock market valuations to fall. Which has a massive negative wealth effect. The decline in human consumption causes an economic decline as measured by GDP.

You then have a population with no purpose other than leisure activities. Are the robots going to keep them in line?

The only way the large tech companies can hold onto all of the profits, is if they can somehow control what the voters think and make them believe the status quo is good for them. Twitter/X, instagram, YouTube etc is solving that problem for big tech for now. But is that sustainable? Are humans really going to allow machines to take over our work and our democracy?

This takes no real account of how technology is influencing defence, policing, law and order, education, health, the environment, or democracy itself.

We don’t really know where it all lands but from the narrow lens of the market, it seems optimistic to project a winner takes all outcome for corporations continues forever. There must surely be major adjustment pains.





Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to EVBigMacMeal here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community