Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (39) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 84364 
Subject: Re: What happens if Biden wins ?
Date: 05/14/24 2:19 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Why not? 10/7 was a "tragic success" for Hamas.

Because US weakness is signal to others to act, and Hamas read (correctly) that Joe Biden wouldn't exact have a spine made of iron with this.

And they were right.

Biden would have had any different response than Trump to the attack that they thought they were making.

The North Vietnam playbook o has been the manual of choice for 50 years for small countries and terrorist armies to fight bigger and/or more well equipped foes. Winning on the battlefield is only part of it; winning in the media is the other. It helps when you, like the North Vietnamese and Hamas, have a lot of bodies you can throw at your enemy and you don't mind losing them.

Israel is 100% losing the propaganda war. That's been helped along in no small way by a feckless US President in Biden who should have told the (sadly, growing) minority wing of his party to shut up and stop paying lip service to terrorists.

Let's play this out and say Trump is President. In the immediate aftermath of a mass casualty attack on Israel by Hamas, would Trump be more likely to:

a) Issue a call for restraint while saying, "You know, there have been tragedies on both sides..."
b) Call up Netanyahu and tell him to Get Some while promising all the aid he needs, including intel sharing.

a) or b)?

You might say, "But Dope, Trump would have done b) but Biden did that as well". Perfect.

Now advance the clock by 6 months and The Squad and various media outlets are pushing Hamas' talking points about " " Famine " " and what not.

Would Trump

a) say "That's fake news, and Hamas' numbers are complete BS. Only terrorist sympathizers would repeat that stuff. The Israelis take care to avoid civilian casualties while the Hamas animals deliberately target women and little kids. The Israelis need to completely destroy Hamas".

b) say "We are extremely concerned with the reported casualty figures and urge Israel to come to the bargaining table. To encourage this we're considering slowing our support in terms of arms shipments".

What do you think the effect of a) vs. b) is on the media coverage? On campus protests? On the willingness of other countries to wag their fingers at Israel? On Hamas' fighting spirit?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (39) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community