Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (19) |
Author: DTB   😊 😞
Number: of 21944 
Subject: Re: meaningless predictions
Date: 01/08/24 4:27 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 13
So, the celebration should be that the big sudden loss in real purchasing power in the first half of last year has ended, and the recent flat spot is at least better than when we were losing real value gradually for the ~7 years up to the pandemic. But no positive value creation.

I agree with other comments that the real value is the optionality. From time to time there is an opportunity that only someone with a big cash pile can take advantage of.


OK, thanks. Your numbers are much better than my eyeballing and handwaving. And for the sake of argument, I will grant that this big slug of cash may someday enable a big, transformative purchase. That requires a lot of faith, with the dwindling number of candidates big enough to make so much cash necessary, and Buffett's lack of success in acquiring anything big and helpful in the last 10-15, the frustrating persistence of high prices for public companies, and the dwindling number of years that Buffett is likely to have to make this elephantine purchase. But let's just grant the argument that it's always good to have options, and this one may work someday. On top of that, it is still important to see the economic performance of that $160b in float, while we're waiting.

And your better numbers lead me to much the same conclusion. We have gone from about -1% return on the short-term treasuries for 8 years (practically the whole dollar amount of the float being invested in short-term treasuries), to one bad year of -11%, and now up to +1.5% in the last year. So over the last 10 years, that gives us -16.5% (average -1.6%). And now, finally, there's hope that we might be back to the usual positive spread, currently at +1.5%. That roughly 3% swing, from -1.5% to +1.5%, if it holds up, means that that big chunk of $160b in float may be worth a lot more than we might have thought, last year, when it seemed to be just losing money. 3% of $160b is about $5b, and even for a company as big as Berkshire, with $31b in operating earnings, that change in float return is a pretty big deal.

dtb

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to DTB here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (19) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community