Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (62) |
Author: commonone   😊 😞
Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: Reminder - You are your own first responder
Date: 07/07/23 6:08 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
bighairymike: Is total elimination the only outcome that will slake this thirst?

You keep repeating this as if there's a sizeable percentage of the population who advocate total elimination. Jeez, I'm probably as pro-gun safety as anyone here and I would never in my wildest dreams advocate total elimination of guns.

Here, try these:

1. Let's treat guns like cars and require every buyer, of any age, to obtain a license that includes a registration of all purchases plus at least a modest training program.

2. Background checks for all private sales and restrictions on multiple purchases.

3. Allow family members or law enforcement to petition a court to temporarily bar an at-risk person from buying firearms.

4. Some states have gag laws that prevent doctors from talking about guns with a patient, especially children. How about encouraging physicians to discuss guns with patients in different ways.

5. Technology. I need to scan my face or use a finger/thumb print to use my phone. Why not a gun?

6. Research. In 1996, Congress passed the Dickey Amendment which mandated that no CDC funds could be spent on research that 'may be used to advocate or promote gun control.' Umm, why? Restrictions on research funding have had devastating consequences on what we know -- and what we don't -- about gun violence.

There, I didn't take away a single gun.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to commonone here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (62) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community