Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: Texiera on what the d's should do
Date: 03/26/25 1:32 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
You understand that these aren't stealth platforms and that there are radars all over the place in that region, right?

You understand that giving them up to two hours of advance notice lets them do things that they couldn't do in the much shorter amount of time from when these fighters show up on radar? Like moving all of their high-value personnel away from places that they are known to have frequented? Setting up specific anti-aircraft assets in specific locations at that exact time so that they can more effectively engage with an attack that they know is coming - and with which specific weapons platforms, so they can optimize their response?

The reporter never should have been added to the chat. But in terms of the actual information, once they let partners in the region know they're Doing Something the cat is effectively out of the bag.

No, it's not - because those partners in the region treat classified information carefully - knowing that if they don't, they won't be given a heads up in the future. Giving partners in the region a heads up through secure channels, to people who are cleared for that information, is not the same as letting information leak to a third party because the Secretary of Defense didn't have enough sense to avoid typing that specific information into an unsecured commercial app.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community