Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy❤
No. of Recommendations: 3
Because of course they did. Why should they investigate tax fraud?
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-e...(Your disdain for sources that report actual news is noted).
The Justice Department removed an IRS whistleblower and his entire team from the criminal investigation of Hunter Biden's taxes in what his lawyers described to Congress on Monday as an act of retaliation and possible obstruction of congressional inquiries, according to correspondence to lawmakers obtained by Just the News.
The IRS whistleblower, whose name has not been released, is a decorated supervisory criminal investigative agent who led the team probing the presidential son's tax affairs.When the nation's institutions open act to favor one political party over another, and actively punish some but not others, pretty soon you don't have institutions any longer.
No. of Recommendations: 4
Dope1:
(Your disdain for sources that report actual news is noted).Then why keep posting this echo chamber garbage? No, this isn't "actual news".
Media Bias Fact Check: Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to
numerous failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and right-wing propaganda.
GIGO.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-the-news/
No. of Recommendations: 2
Media Bias Fact Check: Overall, we rate Just the News Questionable and Right Biased based on story selection that mostly favors a conservative perspective. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks and the promotion of conspiracy theories and right-wing propaganda.
--------------------
Conveniently leaving out any mention of the veracity of the report on the IRS pulling the team investing Hunter.
Quite similar to libs dismissing a story simply because Fox reported it, rather than investigating did the thing actually happen. Examples are numerous: see the many videos of Border Chaos; see Hunter Biden's laptop does actually exist; see Covid originated from a ChiCom lab leak; and on, and on, and on.
Even a biased squirrel occasionally finds a real acorn.
No. of Recommendations: 1
I think this is great.
It is a sign to the next generation of Ruling Class that they can rip you people off, skirt your laws, and it's ok.
Furthermore, it erodes faith in your basic institutions.
"My Democracy!" - oh hush up stop faking it already.
No. of Recommendations: 1
Then why keep posting this echo chamber garbage? No, this isn't "actual news".
Why do you assume left wing whinging about sources carries any actual weight? It doesn't.
Your "approved sources" carry fake news as an operating principle.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Conveniently leaving out any mention of the veracity of the report on the IRS pulling the team investing Hunter.
Quite similar to libs dismissing a story simply because Fox reported it, rather than investigating did the thing actually happen. Examples are numerous: see the many videos of Border Chaos; see Hunter Biden's laptop does actually exist; see Covid originated from a ChiCom lab leak; and on, and on, and on.
Even a biased squirrel occasionally finds a real acorn.
Of course. The media is full of nonsense, and these "fact checking" outfits are largely jokes.
Even last night as I was driving home, CBS Radio couldn't bear to say that Durham reported that the whole Russiagate fraud came from Hillary! Clinton. They had to say "Trump's opponent in the 2016 Presidential Election".
And this guy would fall all over himself to defend this kind of nonsense.
No. of Recommendations: 4
bighairymike:
Quite similar to libs dismissing a story simply because Fox reported it, rather than investigating did the thing actually happen. Examples are numerous: see the many videos of Border Chaos; see Hunter Biden's laptop does actually exist; see Covid originated from a ChiCom lab leak; and on, and on, and on.Umm.
Prior to the expiration of Title 42, Fox News predicted chaos at the southern border.
After Title 42 expired Fox News reported (their headline): "Title 42 ends; No chaos at border, contrary to speculation" with video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jizk5-_P7XIHunter's laptop? You mean there was skepticism when the legally blind computer repair store operator said he could not identify the person who dropped off the laptop or be sure it was Hunter Biden's but that it had a decal on it that led him to believe it was Hunter Biden's laptop?
Lab leak? The Energy Department had concluded -- with 'low confidence' -- that an accidental laboratory leak in Wuhan most likely caused the coronavirus pandemic. Pretty much the entire scientific community which has studied the genetics of the virus, and the patterns by which it spread, say the most likely cause is that the virus jumped from live mammals to humans -- a phenomenon known as 'zoonotic spillover' -- at the Huanan market
So, no, it's not "libs" dismissing the news, it's Fox News, multiple media outlets when evidence is lacking, and the scientific community.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Prior to the expiration of Title 42, Fox News predicted chaos at the southern border.
And there is.
10,000 crossings a day they somehow cut to 4,000-ish. Mayokas took credit for it, but what he doesn't say and what you don't know is that Abbott has the TX national guard on the border stringing wire and turning people back. Oh, and Mexico is staging people further away.
Context. Matters.
That's why your "sources" are bad.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Lab leak? The Energy Department had concluded --um
--------------------
Yep, when the issue is international skullduggery and biological warfare, the Energy Department is the go to authority.
Meanwhile, the US Dept of Fish and Wildlife has determined that Chinese Spy Balloon was just an off course weather balloon.
No. of Recommendations: 3
bighairymike:
Yep, when the issue is international skullduggery and biological warfare, the Energy Department is the go to authority.Right.
I noticed you ignored that they have "low confidence" in their assessment.
According to the Energy Department low confidence means the information is, quote, "scant, questionable, fragmented or that solid analytical conclusions cannot be inferred from this information."
Meanwhile...
The scientific community is in direct conflict with this new report. There is strong consensus among scientists who study the origin of pandemics. They say there's a large amount of evidence supporting a natural origin. Specifically, the data point to the pandemic starting at the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan, with the virus jumping from a caged animal into people there.
Last year, there were two papers published in the journal Science which outline the evidence for this. They showed photographic evidence that in one stall of the market there were caged wild animals known to be highly susceptible to COVID and known to spew the virus into the air. Inside this particular stall, scientists found SARS-CoV-2 virus on several surfaces. The papers also show epidemiological evidence that probably thousands of people were infected at this market in December 2019 and how the pandemic literally radiated out from this market.But sure, samesies.
https://www.npr.org/2023/02/28/1160157977/u-s-dept...
No. of Recommendations: 2
Yep, when the issue is international skullduggery and biological warfare, the Energy Department is the go to authority.
Talk about delusional. He still clings to the belief that it just jumped right from the wet market?
Goodness gracious. I need to do my thread about how people who rely on the mainstream media really don't know a damn thing about the world they live in. He's Exhibit A.
No. of Recommendations: 0
No. of Recommendations: 11
Quite similar to libs dismissing a story simply because Fox reported it, rather than investigating did the thing actually happen.
So let me get this straight, it's on the viewers of FOX to investigate the veracity of their reporting? The sheeple just accept it and bleat, while critics are expected to do the reporting on Fox commentary? The fact that the entire organization admitted in court that it shills gruel to its hungry masses should be sufficient evidence of the inadmissibility of it's "information". Pro Publica produces evidenced based investigative reporting. Point me to one example of investigative journalism of the same quality at FOX?
No. of Recommendations: 3
So let me get this straight, it's on the viewers of FOX to investigate the veracity of their reporting? = PP
-------------------
That is correct. Only the audiences of CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, and NBC can trust what they are being told with the assurance the reporting is absolutely true, never wrong, never biased and always presented with full context and with freedom and justice for all. Salute!
No. of Recommendations: 0
Hey Don Junior, Ivanka, Sasha, Melia, Jenna, Barbara, Chelsea......
Keep doing what Dad and in some cases GrandDaddy did.
Saudis, Russians, Iranians, China.....
You will get away with it just like before, and jut like Hunter now.
American Citizens. Scratch that- citizen don't mean squat. People living in America:
One more institution NOT to believe in, or abide by.
More more more
