I have read the posts here, and while, I don't consider myself smarter than anyone else, I am retired now, so have time to use this well. For me, 13% a year is good enough.

Also, I have been studying screens for decades now, and have a degree in Electrical Engineering, so I have probably enough math skills to use the software. Hopefully, there are no programming skills required, those I don't have.

My understanding is that you can create more robust screens than you can in stock investor pro. For example, creating O'Shaughnessy's composite value and composite earnings quality factors.

I am the opposite of Musselmant. I like annual screens.

Do sites like FinViz, barchart, and stockrover offer better screening than portolio123.

Then, everything works perfectly until you try it.

Mechanical Investing FAQ

---

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.