Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 88930 
Subject: Re: No more fact checking...
Date: 01/07/25 2:25 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
Gee, I wonder why they've just now made this decision?

It may be simply because they can. Sure, this may be them knuckling under to the incoming Administration - but it may also be that they no longer have to knuckle under to the last one.

Content moderation on a social media site is a complicated and annoying task. There's a million different things you have to moderate just to meet your legal obligations, and a million more that you have to filter out just to keep your site usable for normies. There's probably a huge desire not to also have to take on the added burden of monitoring everything and making judgment calls on whether things are true or not.

Other things being equal, I wouldn't be shocked if FB just wants to not have to deal with it and be more like a phone company than a publisher - they just provide the platform for connecting, and aren't involved in making sure that people aren't lying during their phone calls. That's not feasible for FB, but I'm sure that their late-stage capitalist preferences were always more towards not spending resources on fact-checking if they could avoid it.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy