Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |
Author: g0177325 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 77775 
Subject: Re: Congressional districts are flawed
Date: 04/30/26 3:10 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
The last thing you want is equal area. Land doesn't vote. People vote. You want equal population, not equal area. And that's what we have (roughly - and with gerrymandering).

Yes, you are right. We need some way of creating districts based on equal population that also makes all districts have minimal perimeter per area - as "inflated" as possible if you will - which would eliminate the "snake like" shapes of extreme Gerrymandering.

If you want to better represent the voting population, you're on the right track with more representatives. 10 per district is probably unworkable, but 3 or 4 might work well. Let people vote for one representative on the slate, but the top 3 or 4 (or whatever number you pick) are elected. Of course, that would take a constitutional amendment, so don't look for it any time soon. If ever.

Yes, that could work.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds