Post #4111 by jerryab on the Macroeconomic Trends & Risks board

Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

My insurer is regional (most of MN and parts of WI/IA/NE?) and highly concentrated in the metro Twin Cities area (high population density AND high health care delivery capability). If you have a lot of *independent* doctors in their own practices, that can be a problem for you because the insurer can claim they have *enough* of doctors in specialty care X and don't need more (so yours may not be included). My doctors are in large practice groups, with many care locations, that are almost always included in most health care programs. A few insurers do not include one or the other of these large groups--but omitting BOTH groups would mean the insurer is targeting a client market that wouldn't use them as providers anyway.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3)

Prev | Next

Announcements

Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.