Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (97) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48466 
Subject: Re: What would be more chaos?
Date: 10/30/2024 5:58 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
Lets not forget that the evidence regarding many "X" events was never evaluated by the court because the case was dismissed for lack of standing by the plaintiffs.

Not for any of the Trump cases.

Third parties often don't have standing in disputes over the elections process. But the major-party candidate always does. All of the allegations about the counting of the ballots could have been brought by Trump and/or the GOP as the party. Every single one of them.

So the state of Texas, as a state, doesn't have standing to challenge the election results in Georgia (to use one example of a case dismissed on standing). But all of the candidates in that Georgia race absolutely had standing. So if there was any evidence that an "X" event had happened in Georgia, then Trump's lawyers could have run to the courts with it. They didn't, because no "X" events actually happened in Georgia - the reports of them happening were lies, and those lies ended up costing Rudy Giuliani....well, everything.



Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (97) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds