Post #46295 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

When reading posts, there are yellow stars against the names of the most respected Shrewds. The number of points in the star, starting at 3, represents the Shrewd'm-Star rating. This number is the average recommendation that the author received over the last 12 months.

- Manlobbi

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Prev | Next

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

Sure. But the Felon is forcing them to sue.

Seems to me it falls into the category of cases that judges often make the defendants pay for the attorney's fees because their behavior was so outrageous as to force a suit that never should have been necessary. Not a "slap", but that was the only term I could think of (hence the "akin to"). I'm guessing there are no rules about that? Don't judges censure (or even fine) attorneys when their case is so bad it never should have been a thing (e.g. bypassing due process, withholding funds they had no right to withhold, trying to defend singling out lawyers and firms that oppose them, and so much more)?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.