Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (128) |
Author: sykesix   😊 😞
Number: of 21943 
Subject: Re: Berkshire and Tariffs
Date: 04/10/25 11:21 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
So now what is the price Americans pay to keep the US Dollar attractive to foreigners as a reserve currency? Well one price is that employment in the US no longer includes reasonably high paying jobs that the bulk of Americans can get and use as the basis of a middle class way of life. We traded a bunch of manufacturing jobs for "Do you want fries with that?" jobs.

This isn't true though. Since the US started running a trade deficit in 1980 until now, real income has increased for every decile. Middle income people (which is what you are talking about) have seen their incomes increase by about 20%, which is a non-trivial boost in standard of living.

visualcapitalist.com - Growth in real wages over time by income group USA

en.wikipedia.org - Household income in the United States

To be sure, these gains haven't been shared equally. But that is a matter of public policy, not trade policy.

Similar to agricultural jobs, manufacturing jobs as a percentage of the workforce isn't very big and has been declining for a long time. That's true even in manufacturing powerhouses like Germany. Even if tariffs were 100% successful, the total number of jobs that could potentially be reshored in very small.

Labor statisticians track the number of people who leave their jobs voluntarily. Turns out, coal mining and manufacturing are the industries where the most people tend to leave even though they don't have to. The reason is coal mines and assembly lines aren't good places to work, and there are better jobs with equal or better pay to be had.

So as a matter of public policy, why are we trying to create those types of jobs, instead of service and tech jobs that people actually want?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to sykesix here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (128) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community