Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 84357 
Subject: Re: Audio of Trump's Conversation
Date: 06/27/23 8:54 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Again - the statute prohibits removing documents and materials, not receiving classified information.

Hillary! has always been an innocent bystander her entire life.
How'd all that material get on to Anthony Weiner's laptop?

if Huma Abedin sent Clinton an email describing a meeting that she had the prior day with the Secretary of DOD - the occurrence of which meeting DOD considered classified

Because Huma had the right tickets to have those meetings, sure. <--- Huma likely didn't have any kind of clearance above TS. And BTW it's not hard to get TS.


The destruction of evidence and/or obstruction of justice statutes require more than just knowing that someone might want to see material someday. Absent some legal prohibition, you're perfectly free to delete your own emails or documents or any other record you have.

Except for the classified stuff. She's not allowed to destroy that.

Again, just because someone does something wrong doesn't mean that they've done something that is a criminal violation of a federal statute.

The Clintons are MASTERs at blowtorching any regard for ethics or standards without actually breaking any laws. Amazing, that.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community