Investor: I want freedom.
Shrewd investor: I have Shrewd'm!
- Anonymous Shrewd
- Manlobbi
Stocks A to Z / Stocks U / Upstart Holdings (UPST)
No. of Recommendations: 1
No. of Recommendations: 0
I used to watch this fellow till he became suspect. I used several sources, he was just one.
WIKI
John Lorimer Campbell is an English YouTuber and retired nurse educator known for his videos about the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, the videos received praise, but they later veered into misinformation.[2] He has been criticised for suggesting COVID-19 deaths have been over-counted, repeating false claims about the use of ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment, and providing misleading commentary about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.[3][4][5] As of March 2024, his YouTube channel had 3 million subscribers and over 750 million views
No. of Recommendations: 2
HC, you should know better than this. This is a review in WIKI of the source emagazine "CUREUS" for the article Campbell is reviewing. This Journal retracted 56 papers in January 2024. 56 papers.
WIKI Reception
Its peer-review process involves asking experts to review a given article in a few days, which results in its peer reviews taking much less time than those of most other journals do.[3] Adler told Retraction Watch in 2015 that "Yes Cureus has an unusually fast review process, which is an important part of the journal’s philosophy. We believe that post publication peer review, a focus of our journal through commenting and our unique SIQ process, is potentially a more powerful way to discern truth."[5] Nevertheless, the speed and the quality of this peer review process, as well as the article-level metric "Scholarly Impact Quotient" (SIQ) used by Cureus has attracted the criticism of librarians[6] and scientists who worry that the SIQ could be gamed.[7]
A study conducted by librarians of Emory University in 2022 found that Cureus and Oncotarget together represented 50% of publications deemed controversial or predatory.[clarification needed][8]
Cureus was also criticized for having published a revision of an article that had been elsewhere retracted because of methodological reasons and scrutiny for “possible violations of medical ethics and human rights” (the results of a Covid-19 proxalutamide trial in Brazil).[9]
In April 2022, Cureus displayed a Wall of Shame to "highlight authors who have committed egregious ethical violations as well as the institutions that enabled them".[10] This feature drew criticism as it unjustly put the emphasis on individuals, in particular the corresponding author. This feature was withdrawn in May 2023.
In April 2022, Cureus published notes of concerns relating to nearly 50 papers published without the knowledge of the corresponding author/disputed authorship. In January 2024, 56 papers were retracted.[11]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cureus
No. of Recommendations: 3
" providing misleading commentary about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines."
Who do you trust with respect to vaccine safety, our CDC, Fauci , Collins, msnbc ? You do know that Doc Gottlieb, on the BODS of PFE, very frequent guest on cnbc, always opposed mandates, right? Many other experts opposed mandates and lockdowns, why were they demonized, vilified, and cancelled? WHERE was the honest debate OR did Fauci claim if you question, HIM, you are questioning the science ? How soon some forget.
No. of Recommendations: 2
lapsody, who do you trust, our CDC ? Fauci ? Where are the follow up studies in the USA to shoot down the " conspiracy nuts" ? Isn't transparency and disclosure always the best disinfective ? If these vaccines are " safe and effective " why is 80 perecent of the country ignoring our CDC ? BTW, if you share fake news on FB they take it down, warn you, or put you in FB reform school for 30 days. So far, no reform school for sharing Johns videos. What do you think of Doc Dalgleish? Once upon a time, anyone who believed it was Hunters laptop, was a conspiracy nut, no ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angus_Dalgleish
No. of Recommendations: 0
always the best disinfective = disinfectant
No. of Recommendations: 1
Here is the hour with doc dalgleish, does he ever claim they have conclusive proof that a third booster increases the incidence of cancer? Should the cdc be doing studies to shoot down these theories to regain our confidence? Watch it , don’t watch it, it’s fine either way. Safe and effective? Obviously many of us aren’t that sure??
https://rumble.com/v4pjyex-caner-after-covid-vacci...
No. of Recommendations: 15
hclasvegas:
What do you think of Doc Dalgleish? Once upon a time, anyone who believed it was Hunters laptop, was a conspiracy nut, no ?Well, it's right there in
your link: Dalgleish belonged to a secret group that called itself the "Covid Hunters" that claimed that the best candidate for vaccine development against the virus was Norwegian Biovacc-19 but that Dalgleish had been given stock options in the company Immunor which held the patents for this vaccine due to his own significant involvement in the research behind its development.
In short: follow the money.
He was implicated in some other controversies but that one is enough to question his motives.
As for nurse educator John Campbell, we discussed him here briefly over a year ago:
https://www.shrewdm.com/MB?pid=60014048Campbell often spreads misinformation such as a Swiss study that found that after a COVID-19 booster less than 3% of people briefly had a slightly elevated blood level of a protein that can be a marker of heart injury. [If you'll recall, Bronny James's heart attack was blamed on this protein elevation and the Covid-19 vaccine. James was later diagnosed with an “anatomically and functionally significant Congenital Heart Defect” which caused his sudden cardiac arrest.]
Despite the fact that no one in the Swiss study had any serious heart damage, and other experts said the findings are unlikely to be clinically significant, Campbell said that the risk shown by the Swiss study was “off the scale” and that “the only way you would take this kind of risk in health care is if the alternative was certain death.” His YouTube claim had over a million views.
In short, Campbell is a self-promoting conspiracy theorist.
As for Hunter's laptop -- Jesus are we still talking about that? -- initially "we" said it had the earmarks of Russian disinformation (it did) and that the real issue with the laptop is chain of evidence: forensic experts who analyzed a copy of the hard drive said it had been written to [files and folders were added] after it was out of Hunter's hands and that it would be impossible to determine who tampered with it. "We" also pointed out that Rudy Giuliani had the hard drive in his possession and had there been anything truly incriminating on it [real or fake] he would have shown it to the world at a Four Seasons Landscaping press conference.
The larger question though, is this: why are you trolling us with this nonsense?
No. of Recommendations: 2
“ In short: follow the money.“ good morning common, miraculously we, have found common ground, do you know who Fauci’s wife is ? Do you recall Fauci vigorously disclosing who she is and her role, while he was pounding the table mandating vaccines and assuring us lab leak believers were conspiracy nuts? Google Fauci’s wife, I know you are fair snd balanced, thank you. ☮️
No. of Recommendations: 2
“ The larger question though, is this: why are you trolling us with this nonsense? “” Common, no one denies you are very good at what you do. The obvious question is, are you being paid or compensated in any way by parties or entities affiliated with the Dem party or liberal causes or are you here because of the goodness of your heart? I’ll go first, I haven’t been employed or compensated in any way since 1992, who would hire me? How many hours a week do you spend providing this fair and balanced coverage? Thank you.
No. of Recommendations: 3
hclasvegas: good morning common, miraculously we, have found common ground, do you know who Fauci’s wife is ?
Dr. Christine Grady is the Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the NIH Clinical Center and Head of the Section on Human Subjects Research at the NIH Clinical Center.
Your point, if you have one?
No. of Recommendations: 1
Common, the point is Fauci should have disclosed, day one, who his wife is, and that they, entities they are affiliated with, and foundations they are affiliated with, would benefit from vaccine mandates and lab leak denial.
No. of Recommendations: 1
Who do you trust with respect to vaccine safety, our CDC, Fauci , Collins, msnbc ? You do know that Doc Gottlieb, on the BODS of PFE, very frequent guest on cnbc, always opposed mandates, right? Many other experts opposed mandates and lockdowns, why were they demonized, vilified, and cancelled? WHERE was the honest debate OR did Fauci claim if you question, HIM, you are questioning the science ? How soon some forget.
Get it through your head I wasn't in the USA and watching from a distance on an island in the Philippines. Campbell was in Britain. I read quite a bit and tracked down a reference to an Asian virus expert, where he stated that his work showed that sunlight, humidity, and temperature should kill the virus. Humidity needed to be 60% or higher. Some old Stanford guy was freaking out and didn't see how this could be true and showed me a Covid map of the USA intended to frighten you. I said you realize we are a tropical island right? What do we have in common with the USA? The Euro expats tended to be sane, but the American expats were bonkers. I stayed home mostly for a month because they requested it. Got masks and used them. My side of the island remained Covid free for a long time and then Covid hit the island of Cebu next to us and worked over. We had stay homes. We were asked to wear masks and did so, though after a bit some people didn't wear over their nose ( which rendered them useless). We watched Trump's bleach and sunlight performance. We had the same experience everyone else had, it just took longer to start and would be over much quicker.
The first time we had a wave come through it was due to an old elitist lawyer who went to Manila, didn't use masks when he should've, and brought it home. We killed that wave using protocols. Later - well the other side of the island got it bad for a couple of months and passed it to us. People cooperated. I told you one person who I was following later, but you don't remember, do you? Never heard of Gotlieb, wasn't watching much American TV.
No. of Recommendations: 5
This is why I had you blocked for ages HC, you;re a nutter who can't lean it appears. Answer your own questions, as only yoiu can pulll yourself out of your nutter stupor.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Don't bother posting your Doc. I'm not spending any time watching garbage
No. of Recommendations: 8
hclasvegas: Common, the point is Fauci should have disclosed, day one, who his wife is, and that they, entities they are affiliated with, and foundations they are affiliated with, would benefit from vaccine mandates and lab leak denial.
What entities and foundations? And how is her employment relevant to Fauci or his former role? Her expertise is on ethical issues in clinical research and clinical care, HIV disease, and nursing. You're just one big stew of misinformation and conspiracy theories.
