Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (53) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Trumps Anti-Robin Hood Tax...
Date: 11/20/25 8:51 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
I don't think debt financing necessarily results in a false prosperity.

One of the things that has always perplexed me is why the total national debt (around $38-39 Trillion right now I believe) isn't balanced against national ASSETS. I'm not sure if the assets should be only government assets or included privately-held assets. But normally, balance sheet includes debt vs. assets, not just the debt.

I mean, things like our Army, Navy, real estate/national parks owned by the federal government, and lots of other things, are probably difficult to value. But they do have a value, and I'm sure it's a lot.

The annual budget is running around $7 trillion and annual debt service is running around $1 trillion so around 14% of the budget is devoted to debt service. The trend isn't good because I believe the debt is going up around $1.78 trillion a year or somewhere around that.

We also have trillions in off balance sheet unfunded liabilities like future Medicare costs.

In the 1990's we had a few years of balanced budgets which can be attributed to raising taxes on wealthier people, cutting expenses, plus a booming economy (the rise of the internet).

I think the 2028 Presidential contest will be a very interesting year because one of the budgetary issues that is coming up pretty quickly is the Social Security shortfall predicted for 2032 or 2033. The trust fund runs out and payments in will only serve to allow maybe 75% of SS benefits to be paid going forward if adjustments are not made.

So that issue should be squarely on the table (although it's been kicking around for decades with nothing done about it).

If not addressed by whoever the President and Congress is in 2028/2030, it will HAVE to be addressed by whoever is elected in 2032. There are a number of solutions but it's too politically touchy so no one wants to do anything about it because they can kick the can down the road a few more years.

How we are able to handle the coming social security crisis will tell us a lot about how we may be able to handle longer term issues such as the general budget deficit.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to marco100 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (53) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community