Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: The party of Lincoln...
Date: 03/25/24 11:56 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Mostly strawmen. Not worth knocking most of them down.

And yet, several propane salesmen on this board attempt to argue those very things.

Though violent crime is near an all-time low (property crime is up a bit), and the economy is producing oodles of jobs (unemployment is also near an all-time low). Both of those topics can't be encapsulated in a one-liner, as they are more complex. But those are facts, which you can look up if you care to.

Violent crime is at an all time low? https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/exp...
I suppose it depends on your frame of reference. Lots of folks in denial want to use 1990 as the frame of reference. Me, I prefer...5 years ago.

Unemployment: St. Louis Fed (FRED): Total Unemployed, Plus All Persons Marginally Attached to the Labor Force, Plus Total Employed Part Time for Economic Reasons, as a Percent of the Civilian Labo
Zooming in, it took over 2 years for U-6 to return to pre-pandemic but is now trending up.

That's the raw, uncurated data, which is what I prefer to work off of.

That would probably be a good idea. If you actually read it, you'd see that they'll jump all over a Dem (e.g. Obama, Biden, Menendez) when they screw up. Sure, they may lean a bit left, but they aren't a propaganda rag. Drop the Gateway Pundit, and a few others, which isn't suitable for lining a bird cage.

The NYT does not such thing. They only "jump on" a democrat when they use the comical "Republicans pounce" or "Republicans seize" phrasing that allows them to not actually talk about what the latest malfeasance coming from the democrats is, but rather the fact that the Republicans are talking about it. It allows them to claim a veneer of journalistic credibility while in reality they're carrying water for the dnc.

No thanks. They are as far from credible journalism as anyone is.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community