Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
No. of Recommendations: 3
Well, Slotkin, Kelly and the other video making traitor Crats:
I hope your happy with yourselves.
You told the world that everyone has the duty to follow our own individual consciences, and we all have a duty to resist any illegal orders from Trump.
What happened today? A federal clown imitating a judge ruled that Trump's order deploying the national guard to D.C. is illegal
So if course, educated by the traitor Crats psyops video, an assassin who is very likely a jihadi by his facial hair, resisted. Illegal orders must be resisted by any means possible.
He sure did resist that illegal order, didn't he.
This shooting lies squarely at the feet of the six Traitor Crats, as well as all of you ProGlibs who sided with the traitor Crats and hold the same views.
Happy thanksgiving you scum suckers
No. of Recommendations: 15
This shooting lies squarely at the feet of the six Traitor Crats,
The six patriots who made that video basically recited the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
If Hegseth keeps sending in troops, especially given the rulings of illegality that are starting to pile up, this is what he’s going to get, as sure as water turns to ice under 32 degrees F.
Wish it wasn’t true, but let me turn a phrase on you that the right has so frequently tried to trademark for themselves:
“You simply don’t understand human nature.”
Cause and effect.
And the cause is Trump’s continuous illegality.
No. of Recommendations: 3
The six patriots who made that video basically recited the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Which section? Because Mark Kelly should have read a little further...
No. of Recommendations: 3
Wzambon,
You're nuts.
You just endorsed the shooting of the National Guard troops because you think the order deploying them to D.C. was illegal.
Clinically insane.
No. of Recommendations: 3
Dope 1,
Wzambon is crazy. Literally. He just endorsed the shooting of the National Guard troops because he believes Trump's order deploying them to D.C. was unlawful.
He's outright endorsing murder as his preferred form of "resistance."
No. of Recommendations: 4
Wzambon is crazy. Literally. He just endorsed the shooting of the National Guard troops because he believes Trump's order deploying them to D.C. was unlawful.
I'll be charitable and give Bill a chance to revise and extend his remarks. But I've seen that exact same talking point among democrats and media people all day.
No. of Recommendations: 2
No, charity is not deserved.
Wzambon and everyone else parroting those views is endorsing murder as an acceptable political response to what they view as an illegal deployment of troops by Trump.
Don't enable the terrorists even if you know this guy as "Bill."
"Bill" is not a nice guy.
"Bill" is evil incarnate.
No. of Recommendations: 9
Some grayling quoted by Dope1: Wzambon is crazy. Literally. He just endorsed the shooting of the National Guard troops because he believes Trump's order deploying them to D.C. was unlawful.
Yeah, no, he didn't.
And a federal district court judge on November 20, 2025 did, in fact, rule that the deployment of thousands of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C. was “likely unlawful” under federal law.
No. of Recommendations: 1
"Bill" is not a nice guy.
"Bill" is evil incarnate.
Yep, Pastor S/A is all that.
No. of Recommendations: 12
Marco the Clown,
That is a dumb stretch of logic even for someone of limited capacity like you. None of the six Democrats called for anyone to get shot or get hurt. In fact only one federal employee has publicly called for the death of someone else (oddly enough you don't have a problem with that call to violence).
Furthermore you are being dishonest. They never said that "Illegal orders must be resisted by any means possible.". Those are your words. Their words were to resist illegal orders, that doesn't mean shooting your superior officer. Plus your post doesn't make any sense in that you said the shooter "He sure did resist that illegal order, didn't he.". There was no order.
Do better you ignorance is ruining the economy, the country, and the ideal of the U.S.
"Happy thanksgiving you scum suckers"
There is a reason you are known as The Clown.
No. of Recommendations: 1
And a federal district court judge on November 20, 2025 did, in fact, rule that the deployment of thousands of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C. was “likely unlawful” under federal law. >/i>
-------------
Meh. Another district court order that will be turned over on appeal.
No. of Recommendations: 9
You're nuts.
You just endorsed the shooting of the National Guard troops because you think the order deploying them to D.C. was illegal.
Clinically insane.
Go back and read what I actually wrote.
If you saw someone playing with dynamite, and you told them to stop or they would blow themselves up, and sure enough, they blew themselves up, do I have permission to say you advocated them blowing themselves up before they actually blew themselves up?
I’ve been warning for sometime that something like this would happen.
That doesn’t mean I advocated what you said I advocated, because I didn’t.
But it does make you a lying idiot.
No. of Recommendations: 7
So if course, educated by the traitor Crats psyops video, an assassin who is very likely a jihadi by his facial hair, resisted. Illegal orders must be resisted by any means possible.
What a steaming pile of horseshit, completely untethered from reality.
The real psyops here isn’t a bunch of legislators summarizing the UCMJ, it’s people like you, spinning anything and everything that happens as somehow connected to the fantasy world you have bought into.
In the word of your orange messiah, SAD!
—Peter
No. of Recommendations: 2
Peter,
They're not JAG lawyers and they didn't summarize the UCMJ. None of them are competent to do so.
Next b.s. point?
No. of Recommendations: 6
None of them are competent to do so.
Tell me, marco. Do you have a driver license? Didn’t you have to learn some basics of traffic laws to get that license? And couldn’t you tell me some of those basics today?
You are just as qualified to talk about basic traffic laws as they are to talk about the basics of laws regarding military service.
And the fact that an illegal order should not be followed is so basic that even I - who have never served in the military nor in a federal police agency - am aware of it.
Your attempts at attacking the knowledge of these folks might be comical if it weren’t so sad.
—Peter
No. of Recommendations: 8
Your attempts at attacking the knowledge of these folks might be comical if it weren’t so sad.
His attack is part of the effort, led by this administration, to criminalize all who dare mention the law.
All in the service of “Law and Order”, you understand.
Anyone who tries to guard the guardrails is a traitor.
