Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (24) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48468 
Subject: Re: Vance Wrote Project 2025 Forward
Date: 07/27/2024 4:10 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
"Greater good" is squishy, so you dodged the question. I quote the original question for you again:

Imagine you were a Senator. That same bill comes to the floor, but it's got an extra provision in it. It has a provision that bars any state from prohibiting abortion in the first trimester. It makes it a federal crime to commit infanticide and it would undo nearly every first-trimester abortion restriction in the Red states.

As a senator, you can either vote 'yea' or 'nay'. Is it the "greater good" to allow a prohibition on bans of first-trimester abortions if you can get the "Born Alive" act in the deal? I'm curious about your answer, also. And it does illustrate the compromises elected officials have to make to get some of what they want.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (24) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds