Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (36) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Hegseth Confirmed
Date: 01/25/25 2:10 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Turning this back to the serious part of the topic.

The question is, Is the military in good shape right now?

The answer is a clear NO. The Navy in particular is in a shambles. Oh, sure, the warfighting systems designed 30 years ago are doing magnificently...but that doesn't mean anything if you can't get gas and rockets out to the Arleigh Burkes (One of America's coolest Admirals ever, btw) at sea. Or it you keep closing down the refueling stations that you do actually have for environmental reasons.

Or stuff like this
military.com - US navy oiler reportedly runs aground near oman

The Navy oiler Big Horn sustained damage while operating off the coast of Oman on Monday, with reports that the Military Sealift Command vessel suffered flooding and damage to its rudder post.

Hegseth has his work cut out for him. The Air Force, once it gets rid of the #woke morons who think they don't need white fighter pilots seems to be in decent shape equipment and mission-wise with the Andruil and General Atomics Loyal Wingman drones plus the fact that they had NGAD in the air some years ago.

The Marines need heavier equipment than they have. Giving up their tanks without at least some kind of firepower augmentation elsewhere seems like a bad idea:
marinecorpstimes.com - Goodbye tanks how the marine corps will change and what it will lose by ditching its armor

I would love for Hegseth to call the Air Force's bluff: You don't want A-10s? Fine. Close air support is now, with the exception of Army Aviation units, the purview of the United States Marine Corps. Give them the A-10s and a compliment of forward air controllers.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (36) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community