Post #42324 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 20

Looked at the other thread. Usual symphony from the usual suspects.

That's an odd response, from you. You and I have had extensive conversations about what you think the statutes governing classified and national security information mean. Under your view of the statutes, the deliberate transmission of classified national defense information over an unsecured unapproved commercial app to non-secured devices isn't just incompetence - it's criminal behavior that merits prosecution. The inclusion of Goldberg was an inadvertent mistake; but the choice to transmit that specific information through that specific channel intentional. Under your view of the law, at a minimum Waltz and Hegseth committed crimes, not merely incompetence.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.