Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Post New
Author: sano 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48467 
Subject: wELL rEGULATED
Date: 04/30/2024 10:07 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
Four law enforcement officers have been fatally shot and four others were wounded while serving an arrest warrant in Charlotte, North Carolina.
The officers were part of a US Marshals Service-led task force. The warrant they were attempting to serve on Monday was against a felon wanted for illegally possessing a firearm.


Yawn. Another day in Freedomville.

It's absurd that the court would discriminate against ghost guns, bump stocks, silencers, and other instruments of freedom that are Making America Great Again.
Print the post


Author: Lapsody 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48467 
Subject: Re: wELL rEGULATED
Date: 04/30/2024 2:07 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
There seems to be a hybrid being set up by the right wing. The individual rights found in the 2d Amendment were attributed to the introductory clause (well regulated militia) having no effect on the operative clause (right to keep and bear arms). However, the Constitution and subsequent acts, etc., gives the Fed and State the ability to designate the militia, arm them, and the President the power to call them up. Modernly, the militia is now the National Guard and a small navy. The draft pool of able bodied men is called the unorganized militia.

To justify owning any weapon and the Fed to be limited in this area, court cases from prior to Heller reasoned they were necessary for the militia. You'll find court cases reasoning that this weapon would be necessary for the militia, so individuals can own it. So we're looking at a hybridization to get individual rights independent of the militia, and types of weaponry allowed based on the militia.

These look like conflicting views that will be reconciled with difficulty, but have faith in MAGA, they can do it and insist on it.
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds