Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (51) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84360 
Subject: Re: Newsom: We'll still do the tariffs
Date: 09/01/26 4:15 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
They've banned all US alcohol since March of last year.

The initial tariffs against Canada and Mexico were imposed in February of last year. The bans on alcohol in several of the provinces were imposed in response to that.

That's what I thought. Not 1 millimeter. Shoot, not even a micron.

I'm not sure what you're talking about. This is Trump's strategy choice - he came out literally in the first two weeks of his Administration and decided to unilaterally impose tariffs on Canada. There have, of course, been trade disputes with Canada (and Mexico and almost every other country we do serious trade with) for decades and decades, with various degrees of debate. But Trump threw out the old playbook entirely, and rather than have discussions or negotiations about trade issues he decided to implement a unilateral 25% across-the-board tariff against Canada.

He's the one that chose this particular way of dealing with trade with Canada, and that's what prompted Canada's responses. Both initially in Spring of 2025, and all of the times since then. It's his "negotiating" style - one where no arrangement is finalized or settled, where any concession made to the other party can be retraded at any time or unilaterally abrogated. That's what's leading Canada to start playing this particular style of hardball in return. If your negotiating style involves unilateral imposition of massive tariffs across billions of dollars of goods, then your counterparty is likely to adopt a similar style of negotiation.

So I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. That Canada somehow deserved to be treated shabbily in the method and means of resolving any trade disputes? That they somehow caused Trump to impose a unilateral 25% punitive tariff - something unprecedented in U.S. trade policy - in lieu of other methods of negotiation? I'm not sure I see any basis for that.

If your approach to international trade is to shoot first with big unilateral tariffs, you can't be surprised that your counterparties start incorporating big unilateral moves into their own approach. It's a very aggressive and hostile approach, but once you've chosen it, it's too be expected that others will follow suit.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (51) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community