No. of Recommendations: 5
You're attacking me personally for suggesting an article about a legitimate long haul serious physicist who's challenging your commonly held beliefs.
Nope. I never do that. I did attack the science writer for his sloppiness, and explicitly exonerated you. You were just quoting him.
I did not read every word, no. I read enough to know the science writer for that publication was sloppy, and therefore suspect. He didn't get everything wrong. In fact, he got a lot correct. It's quite possible he didn't understand the scientist (and science) he was trying to report on. Wouldn't be the first time that has happened in lay-media. I don't trust that he really understood Zurek's paper(s), and he didn't link to them that I could see.
