Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (160) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: Trump To Allow Crypto In 401K's...
Date: 08/07/25 3:44 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 15
And, thankfully, we already have exactly what you're asking for in terms of a wonderful incentive placed on the financial houses to NOT allow for betting on Red 11 in 401(k) portfolios.

Following up after my own post, in a piece of fortuitous timing the BusinessWeek columnist Matt Levine (whom I adore reading) led off today's column with a discussion about the changes that will allow for some more spicy investing in 401(k)'s. And which has some additional information about the specific mechanism by which the Administration is going to allow them to invest in crypto.

In a nutshell, you're both right and wrong about the above. We do have exactly what I'm asking for in the form of the incentive placed on the financial houses - and it's exactly that incentive that the Administration is going to remove. The specific change that the Administration is directing the Department of Labor to make is to revise the regulations that govern what constitute fiduciary responsibilities on alternative investments in 401(k)s. More specifically, it is currently the situation that if an employer's 401(k) allows you to be on Red 11 in the 401(k) that they will get sued - but the change that the Administration is proposing is to stop that and to make it so you won't be able to sue them for letting you bet on Red 11 in the future, which completely removes the "wonderful incentive" you were describing.

https://archive.ph/AxpDU
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (160) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community