Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (39) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: One Possible Tariff Endgame
Date: 04/15/25 1:00 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 18
Imperfect? I'd choose distracted and unserious as my adjectives for Europe these days.

The EU is still the second largest economy on earth. Second largest in the world by volume of imports, second largest in the world by volume of exports. They are enormous in the global economic stage, whatever imprecations you wish to hurl at them. Add in the other major OECD players, and the balance of the Western economies is bigger in all respects than the U.S. So if you want to go to economic war against China, it's foolhardy beyond belief to not do it in concert with those countries.

I'd rather have gone that route also. But that's neither here nor there at this point, yes? I'll let you pick the metaphor about spilled milk or water under the bridge or the train having left the station.

No. After all, the Administration could admit their error, scrap the tariffs as ill-considered, and contritely express their desire to focus primarily on containing China and work to repair the relationship with the rest of the major global economic powers. It will be hard, because the U.S. has burned trust and goodwill that took eight decades to build. But it's the correct move if you're putting U.S. interests first. I know DJT doesn't do contrition, so that's a fantasy. But the fact that his personal failings don't allow him to change course doesn't mean that it's not possible. He's just going to keep compounding his error, instead of climbing down.

The metaphor I'd use is that "if you're in a hole, stop digging." The Administration has committed a disastrous error with this tariff policy. With each passing day that they continue to pursue it, the damage increases. They won't be able to undo all the damage, of course - but they could mitigate by abandoning this course. Rather than pretending that there's no alternative than to keep pressing on.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (39) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community