Post #1556 by commonone on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (19)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 6

Dope1: Your party already said no primary debates with Biden.

When's the last time a sitting president debated a challenger in a primary?

You think a sitting president should debate anyone who wants to throw his/her hat in the ring? Like the Bannon-backed Kennedy?

So where's your beef with candidate Trump who said he's not going to debate in the primaries: "I'm leading by 40 points. A lot of people say, 'Why would you do a debate when you have people at two and three and fifteen and fourteen'" and "People don't debate when they have these massive leads."?

So it's okay that Trump, who isn't the sitting president (and several other candidates have declared they're candidates), says he won't debate them but that the fix is for Biden?

No more malarky, Jack.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (19)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.