Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (32) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: 51st State
Date: 03/11/25 12:43 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 9
Its unclear why Trump (his intentions are often hard to interpret) but more generally MAGA or Republicans are keen on adding Canada as a 51st state.

They're not. To the extent that Republicans have discussed it on the merits, rather than as a sideshow, they've acknowledged that adding the more-liberal-than-conservative Canada into our system would be bad (on the whole) for the GOP.

Trump uses a number of tools in his dealing with people and countries, two of which are dominance and hyperbole.

He places great importance on establishing dominance, which is why he goes in for weird handshakes and disparaging nicknames. Describing Canada as a mere "state" of the U.S., or suggesting that it would be a step up for them to give up their country in exchange for statehood, is another variant of that. Rather than ridiculing them with a silly nickname, he demeans Canada by continually suggesting they're not quite "sovereign nation" material. Or to quote South Park, "they're not even a real country anyway."

His real estate developer side comes through with his penchant for hyperbole - he likes big, exaggerated claims and statements and gestures. He has a predilection towards bombast and hype generally - so he's not going to just establish a dominant relationship with Canada, he's going to actually absorb them. He also has a fondness for moonshot proposals that will make him a significant figure in American history; for good or bad, he wants to be one of the Presidents that people will remember. No "Benjamin Harrison" will he be, that's for sure.

So while he'd love for it to actually happen, it accomplishes most of his goals just to keep harping on Canada being a state even if nothing ever comes of it.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (32) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community