Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Fox News Freaking Out
Date: 11/06/25 10:17 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
The more I think about it the more brilliant I find Mamdani’s pledge. Free buses, free day care, and a rent freeze are an immediate and huge injection of income into poor and working lads families in NYC without a direct cash transfer. It is an example of alleviating poverty by expanding the social wage. It’s the kind of thing democrats should be advocating for everywhere.

From a political perspective, absolutely. This is why I think the Democrats' biggest political problem over the last two decades or so has been climate change. Voters support the Democratic position on climate change ("We should do something,"), but they do not in any way share the Democratic priority on climate change ("It's the most important thing.")

So when the BBB got turned into the IRA and the BIL, and the Democrats were forced to actually prioritize and pick/choose which things got included and which things got cut, the majority of the direct spending and tax provisions that survived were all for green endeavors. Child care, permanent ACA subsidies, universal pre-K...all got dumped so there would be money left for the clean measures. The bill was primarily a climate bill, both on the tax and spending side.

That hurt in two ways. First, as you point out, there are lots of other things that cost money but have an immediate impact - while all the green stuff involved (mostly) capital investments and infrastructure that takes years to actually manifest. And second, most voters want climate change to be "solved" but rank it as vastly less important than almost any other issue - which has not been the position of the Democratic party for quite a while.

Of course, Goofy's point is well taken. These positions are great for campaigning on, but they're a bear to actually implement. For example, there's a reason why even transit advocates are cautious about getting ride of fares, and whether buses can be both "fast and free," as Mandami promised. Making them free guts the budget for the bus program, dramatically induces people to switch from walking and biking to riding the bus (even for very very short trips), and makes the bus a free place to sit and get out of the weather for a while. So the service becomes free, but you run the risk of landing at a "you get what you pay for" degraded level of quality.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community