Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |
Author: wzambon 🐝 BRONZE
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84363 
Subject: "A Tale of Two Camps"
Date: 07/06/25 5:58 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 17
Two camps sat on the Guadalupe River, and for one, it was the best of times. For the other, it was the worst of times.

Barely ten miles by river separated the two camps. Both had portions of their camps directly by the river, and other portions of their camps were located at varying elevations above the river.

One, Camp Mystic, made the mistake of believing the NWS and local rebroadcasts of the NWS warning that flooding was expected on the Guadalupe. The Guadalupe always flooded. There was nothing unusual about that, just as there was nothing unusual about the NWS forecast of 3-5 inches of rainfall. Sure, it would be a problem, but they'd faced similar problems before.

The other camp, Mo-Ranch, was a Presbyterian camp whose director had some questions about the NWS ability to issue warnings in a timely manner, or track rainfall amounts in anything resembling an actionable fashion....

So the one camp trusted the system.

The other camp sent its staff to the river to monitor conditions on a minute by minute basis, lift canoes and kayaks to higher ground and then, as conditions worsened, move staff and campers to safer elevations.

As the flood waters receded, both camps were revealed to be devastated, but there, the similarities ended. One camp suffered tremendous loss of life. The other kept all of its staff and campers-safe. In fact, its staff has now spread out in the Kerrville area to assist local residents of the hill country.

This is a true story

And the moral of the story is not to condemn one camp while heaping praise on the other for their trust or lack of trust. The one camp cannot be condemned for believing that the NWS provided accurate and up to date data on rainfall and flood conditions. After all, they'd been fairly accurate in past floods.

But the other camp refused to trust without verifying. And that is good advice for everyone going forward. You're on your own, guys. Don't trust anything coming out of this particular federal government. You could die.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to wzambon here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community