Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |
Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 21944 
Subject: Re: brkb, up 8 plus,
Date: 07/23/25 11:26 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 18
Lou Simpson was investing a much smaller amount than T&T and yet both his trades and his overall record were able to be viewed by shareholders. Today that type of info is treated as classified information.

They were both disclosed in the same required way on the 13f forms, specifically in the same minimal way required by law. Unless I am greatly mistaken, it just so happened that Mr Simpson worked for a different legal entity within the group, so his trades could be identified that way.

As far as I know, the only reduction in the amount of information disclosed is that the annual report no longer includes a list of the top ten equity holdings with their share counts and cost basis prices. I suspect that one reason is that Berkshire became so big that, other than a couple of positions which were discussed like Apple, the firm was no longer primarily an equity holding company and individual stock positions were no longer very material to understanding the progress of the business. With few exceptions one can look at it as merely a portfolio, especially as it's no longer likely that superior stock picking will make much difference to returns over time.

As an aside, bear in mind that the purpose of the 13f is not so the public can see what investment managers are doing. It's so the SEC can know who has control of company shares. The fact that it allows people to be copycats is a side effect.

Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community