Post #1280 by RAMc on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 8

lizgdal, Thanks for posting postmortem of our declining performance of the screens.
Way back in time I used a what’s working lately methods of selecting which screens
to use. Just to torture myself I loaded your results into an excel spread sheet and:
Each year selected the 4 screens the had the average weighted gains over the last three
Years weighted by 4*last year,+3*the year beforeand 2* 3years before.
10 years 1994 thru 2003 CAGR = 52%
10 years 2004 thru 2013 CAGR = 38.5%
10 years 2014 thru 2023 CAGR = 4.6%
The screens are dead replaced by more sophisticated analysists with better techniques.

RAM

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.