Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (43) |
Author: RAS337 ✸  😊 😞
Number: of 22989 
Subject: Re: Google financing big Data Centers
Date: 10/27/26 9:31 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 13
It is pretty obvious to people that are not in that silo.
Like that lady in France who got her store stripped.

People on investment boards should really keep their politics to themselves.


I generally agree that people on investment boards should keep their politics to themselves. But nothing in this thread actually jumped out at me as political until this post. It just seemed like a healthy debate about whether the AI build out is a good investment.

Are you referring to the back-and-forth about whether Altman and Musk are liars and conmen? I did not see anything in oddhack's original post that was overtly political. And Musk has made plenty of factual assertions in the business context that turned out to be untrue or inaccurate (e.g., "funding secured"), and which had nothing to do with politics. So, just because Musk has gotten involved in politics does not make every statement about him political. I don't know enough about Altman to say the same thing, but LongTermBRK suggests Altman has lied about many things related to business. RaplhCramden clearly disagreed with oddhack, but again, it was on the merits of what Altman and Musk are doing with their businesses.

So, like I said, I generally agree with you that people on investment boards should keep their politics to themselves. In that vein, sometimes I think we'd all be a little better off if we give each other the benefit of the doubt and not jump to conclusions about political intent that might not be there.

P.S. I also have no idea who the "lady in France" is.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to RAS337 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 22,499 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 58 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 55 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (43) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy