No. of Recommendations: 3
What are you talking about? My statement was that you don't need a photo ID to receive medical care. That removes one of the gates you were claiming exists.
You said, "Doesn't always..." meaning that it's happened at least once. Which mean your population just got whacked thanks to AND.
Indeed. We like to err on not denying people the right to vote. Especially since there is zero evidence that ballots are not secure due to lack of in-person examination of photo ID, but lots of evidence that there are millions of people who do not have the type of ID required by the SAVE Act. The claim of people showing up and doing fraudulent in-person voting is unsupported by evidence - even in this post, you're just linking to some other potential problem, not anything having to do with people fraudulently showing up at the polling place.
So perhaps we should focus on getting people ID. After all, liberals are okay with requiring ID to petition the government (directly from the 1st Amendment) and in keeping and bearing arms (directly from the 2nd Amendment).
Let me ask you a very simple question. Which number do you think is larger?
It's irrelevant what I think the number is because we have no way of knowing.
Let's ask you a simple question: Why are you concerned with finding out what the number is?
