Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |
Author: sano 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84353 
Subject: TWaT Swatting
Date: 04/01/26 3:18 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Public Citizen: "The Trump administration has been open — downright brazen, in fact — about its fixation on abolishing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

Congress established the CFPB after the 2008 financial crisis to protect the American people from wrongful or unfair conduct by Big Banks and other giant financial institutions. The bureau has recovered billions and billions for everyday Americans, and it has helped bring more fairness and transparency to the financial marketplace.

The regime — specifically the man Trump put in charge of the CFPB, Project 2025 architect Russell Vought — has tried to shutter the bureau by refusing to request funding for it as mandated by law.

We sued, and the judge just granted our motion for summary judgment — meaning he ruled in our favor and ordered that funding be requested as required by law.

In his ruling, the judge said the administration “acted arbitrarily, capriciously, and contrary to law.”

The judge also said that Vought’s scheme to defund the CFPB violates Congress’s clear intention to insulate the bureau from exactly the kind of “transparent display of partisanship” the regime was trying to get away with.

Public Citizen was proud to play a role in creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 15 years ago.

And we are proud to score this significant legal victory in defense of the CFPB now.

We don’t yet know whether the other side will appeal, but we are prepared to fight as long as it takes.


Imagine TwaT learned of this swatting on his cellphone as he sat in the SCOTUS hearing birthright hearing... shat himself...hence his sudden departure from the courtroom.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to sano here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community