No. of Recommendations: 2
I'm OK with that. But, as -I think- sano mused, what about cross-overs between religion and politics. Especially in the US, they are hard to separate with any consistency. Consider the IVF ruling in AL. It was political/legal, but the opinion of one judge was riddled with Biblical/theistic references. And that's just the first example I could come up with off the top of my head. Another would be a Speaker (of the House) that has a history of delivering sermons instead of political speeches, even in political settings.
How does one approach that in terms of board selection? I don't want to be a pain, and I do want to follow policy. But I think maybe this separation is going to cause more confusion.
One example I can come up with regarding confusion is the existence of the "astronomy" board and the "science, technology and engineering" board. Astronomy is science. So mostly I put those posts on (what I call) "the science board". Also, the "health and nutrition" board is somewhat subjective. If I'm linking an article, it will almost certainly contain summaries from scientific studies...so, again, "the science board". That's just how I parse it. It's all "the science board" for me.
Again, not complaining. Just points for consideration and/or discussion. It's your sandbox, and I do want to abide (as much as possible) by your rules.
