Post #1177 by Umm on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (114)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

"You keep repeating the claim that "the FEC already ruled it wasn't a violation" which is completely false and I've pointed it out at least twice."

"You can keep repeating yourself a Googleplex number of times, the fact remains that the FEC declined to do anything."

Do you think no one noticed how you moved the goalposts there?

More intellectual dishonesty.

Also, here is another question for you to dishonestly dodge.

Why do you think the FEC declined to do anything?

You will dodge it because it directly refutes your line of argument.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (114)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.