Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (70) |
Author: Dope1 ⎊  😊 😞
Number: of 88930 
Subject: Re: Is NATO figuring it out?
Date: 04/03/26 12:31 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
But they also want other things - they want the rest of the Gulf states to not go nuclear, they want to be able to use proxies without possibly precipitating a nuclear exchange, etc.

There are 2 nuclear powers in Iran's neighborhood, Israel and Pakistan. The Gulf states also are de facto under the United States' nuclear umbrella. There's no universe where the Kuwaitis or Saudis are going to build a nuke unless we walk away from the region (which was the Obama plan). Thankfully we're not doing that.

It's like Donald Trump and Greenland. Trump wants to acquire Greenland. That's not a bluff, it's not a lie, it's not strategic posturing - Trump genuinely wants the U.S. to have possession of Greenland. And Trump could seize Greenland within a few weeks of giving the order.

This is another thing the left gets wrong. What Trump wants is rare Earth minerals and he wants the NATO scofflaws to take Arctic security seriously. If he can get those two things then he doesn't need to annex Greenland. Our NATO "allies" are strategically short-sighted and frankly uninterested in making serious investments in Western economic independence.

Similarly, Iran genuinely and totally wants a nuclear weapon - but they weigh that against the consequences. They are constrained, not by lacking a desire for a nuke, but by the events that going nuclear would precipitate.

You've assumed a certain level of rationality in their decision making. They've demonstrated over 47 years the exact opposite.

Peacetime in the sense of not being in a hot war.
From the Iranian perspective they've been in a hot war with us that entire time.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (70) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy