Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: Joe Walsh
Date: 11/10/25 6:41 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
See what you did there as a “centrist democrat”? You took responsibility for the murderous policies of the republicans.

Not at all. I'm not taking responsibility for them. They are the ones who are responsible for their choices. But Democrats are responsible for their own choices as well.

If your party has the chance to stop the opposing party from doing a terrible thing, you're not absolving them of their own responsibility. But you do have the ability to act and stop the terrible thing from happening. In this case, the Democrats had their own choice to make: continue to press on in the shutdown knowing that it will result in the GOP causing people to go hungry, or to abandon pushing for the ACA subsidy expansion. The choices that the GOP has made are entirely their own fault and their own responsibility - but the Democrats are not without choice and agency, and they have to make the best choice for themselves as well.

Since there was very little chance that they would ever get the subsidy extension, it certainly seems to me like the least bad choice was to stop the shutdown. I totally get that reasonable minds can disagree about that, but I don't see that there was any plausible path to getting an extension into the current bill. The "theory of the case" was that the public would blame the Republicans and/or Trump - and while that was true to some extent, it wasn't true enough that the GOP had any real motivation to yield. Among people who didn't just blame both parties, the difference between those who blamed the GOP and those who blamed the Democrats just wasn't large enough to create any significant pressure on the GOP.

So let me ask you - what do you think would have happened if the Democrats continued to hold out? How do you see that ending that's different than this outcome?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community