Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 48447 
Subject: Re: CNN tries to defend Fordow BDA reporting
Date: 06/27/2025 3:19 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
There you are with the deep state again. Nice of you to telegraph big bullshit is coming.

Who do you think leaked it? Nice of you to roll over and show me your belly 10 seconds into your reply.

It wasn't bogus, it was op research that included every rumor that came down the pike.

You and the others here are literally the only people in the country who still believe in it.

Nothing wrong with that and as long as it's presented as such it's not a false claim.

It was always weasely lawyer crap using the gravitas and credibility those people had (Note: Past tense, "had") in support of their political goals.

The analysis of the damage to the sites and the impact of the strikes on Iran’s nuclear ambitions is ongoing, and could change as more intelligence becomes available. <-- that is a &*(&%@# caveat.

You should have listened to what Trump said at the NATO summit. Or looked at Israel's version of the Atomic Energy Commission. Then you'd know more.

Since you went with snark right out of the gate, I'm not going to tell you where to look. You go figure it out.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds