No. of Recommendations: 1
Overturning Chevron will not directly affect the former issue. It will not hold that administrative law and rule-making are unconstitutional. It would, however, make it so that in litigation over disputed provisions of federal statutes, the agency's interpretation doesn't have any presumption of correctness. So agencies will still be able to issue rules and form administrative law - but the courts won't give them any deference in how they interpret the statutes that form the basis of those rules and administrative law. - Albaby
-------------
Seems like overturning or revising Chevron somehow is a good thing. It moves the needle towards congress making laws with more specificity and precision rather the passing high level goals and leaving it to the unaccountable deep state bureaucrats to flesh out.
Congress will have to consider the consequences and details of the implementation of their oh so very good ideas. More details from congress = enhanced accountability to voters. More details from Congress = less room for partisan deep state bureaucrats to inject personal politics into the regulations they force on the rest of us.
