Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (75) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84360 
Subject: Re: Maintaining focus this election cycle
Date: 06/20/24 2:57 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
The bigger worry, Peter, is that they will reclassify large chunks of the civil service as political appointees (in effect). So if a public servant isn't doing what the administration wants, they'll remove them and put someone in that WILL do what they want. It's called "Schedule F".

They also want to eliminate NOAA because it "is the primary source for climate change alarm" (or words to that effect). There's a lot of stuff like that. But the Schedule F reclassification is the horrifying part. We can debate various policy differences (e.g. the Project 2025 wants to outlaw pornography entirely, outlaw abortion entirely, the roles of the FBI and DOJ would be significantly curtailed, etc). I'm OK debating that. But I'm NOT OK with reclassifying much of the civil service so that they can be replaced based on loyalty rather than competence and experience.

THAT is what will end our republic. And it doesn't even have to be Project 2025. If the Dems came up with their version, and it included a Schedule F type of reclassification, that also would end the republic. Having the civil service be "loyal" to whomever the leader is, above doing their jobs, is a recipe of tyranny.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (75) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community